Cloud Security Assessment
AWS, Azure, GCP
Review of the account structure, identity model, network exposure, logging, and data stores across your cloud environment. The output is an ordered list of the paths that lead somewhere.
03 Service
Review of identity paths, privilege boundaries, and exposure to determine how far an intrusion could propagate.
01 Overview
What one compromised credential is worth in your environment. Not whether your configuration matches a benchmark, but where the identity graph lets an attacker go once they are inside it.
Cloud incidents are rarely a platform failure. They are an access key in a repository, a role that can be assumed more widely than intended, a service account nobody has reviewed since it was created. The provider secures the infrastructure; the configuration on top of it is yours, and that is where the paths are.
02 Engagements
Identity is worth doing first. It tends to determine how much the others matter, and it is where the chains that end in tenant administrator accumulate.
AWS, Azure, GCP
Review of the account structure, identity model, network exposure, logging, and data stores across your cloud environment. The output is an ordered list of the paths that lead somewhere.
The identity layer, on-premise and cloud
Most organizations still run a hybrid identity estate, and most serious intrusions pass through it. We map the delegation, trusts, group nesting, service accounts, and sync configuration to find the chains that end in domain or tenant administrator.
Clusters, workloads, registries
Cluster configuration, RBAC, admission control, network policy, image provenance, and what a compromised pod can reach. Container security is often assumed to be handled by the platform; usually the platform provides the controls and nobody has turned them on.
Blast radius
Given one compromised host or one leaked credential, how far does it travel? We trace the routes outward rather than assessing controls in isolation, because segmentation only matters at the point it fails. This is where flat networks and over-broad security groups become visible.
Making it stick
Turning findings into defined baselines for your platforms, written so they can be enforced by policy rather than by documentation. Where you use infrastructure as code, the baseline belongs in the code, and we work at that level.
03 Process
Configuration-led rather than exploitation-led, so it is quieter than a penetration test and needs less from your production systems.
A read-only role in each account or subscription, scoped and time-limited. We do not need write access, credentials to production data, or an agent installed.
Automated collection of configuration and identity relationships across the environment. This part is tooling, and we are not precious about it: the value is not in enumerating, it is in what follows.
Manual work over the collected graph, looking for chains rather than isolated misconfigurations. A public bucket is a finding; a public bucket holding a key that assumes a role that can read the database is the finding that matters.
Where it is safe and in scope, we confirm a path is actually traversable rather than theoretically so to avoid most of false-positives.
Findings ordered by what they lead to, with the identity chain drawn out.
We work with your cloud administrators through the fixes, then verify. Where a fix belongs in Terraform rather than in the console, we say so, because a change made by hand will be gone by the next deployment.
04 Deliverable
05 Questions
Posture tooling is good at telling you which settings deviate from a benchmark, and bad at telling you which of those actually matter.
A read-only role, time-limited, scoped to the accounts in scope. No write permissions, no access to production data, nothing installed. You can revoke it the moment the engagement ends, and we ask you to.
Enumeration is read-only. Nothing intrusive happens without explicit written agreement.
It changes who fixes things, not whether they need fixing. We can report to you and let you drive it, or work directly with your provider if you would rather.
Yes. Modern infrastructures are hybrid, and treating the cloud in isolation misses the paths that cross between. Active Directory in particular is usually the bridge.
06 Contact
TowerVector will assist you in taking your security strategy to the next level. Please feel free to contact us: